It has been a bleak long weekend for Mufulira's most famous institution. On Saturday morning, Mufulira Wanderers confirmed receipt of a court summons requiring the club's executive committee to appear before the courts on Wednesday, 7 October 2026 — court documents circulating from the filing put the hour at 08:00 — in an action brought by Davies Nsama, a former physical trainer at the club, and the Mufulira Wanderers Community Pressure Group. On Saturday afternoon, the team lost 4-1 at home to Green Eagles.
The club's response, in a strongly worded board statement, attacks the plaintiffs' standing before their case: according to Wanderers' records, those behind the court action are not paid-up members of the club. The summons has been forwarded to the legal department of sponsors Mopani Copper Mines for review, and the club says it will comply with the process. "The summons directs the defendants to appear before the court on 7th October 2026. As a law-abiding institution, Mufulira Wanderers will honour that obligation," the statement reads — while noting that football governance disputes are ordinarily handled within football's own regulatory structures. It also clarified that the summons bars no executive member or manager from football duties.
Even in the statement, the priorities of a football club were visible. "For today, our focus remains firmly on football. Our objective is clear: to fight for the three points," the board said on Saturday, calling on supporters to stay calm — an appeal that Shinde Stadium's scoreboard then made harder to hear. Mighty, nine-time Zambian champions, are rebuilding through the transitional season with a community that takes its ownership of the club seriously enough to sue for it.
What Wednesday holds is procedural first: appearance, and the court's view of who may bring a claim against the executive of a members' club. The wider questions — the plaintiffs' grievances, the committee's mandate, and whether a community pressure group can hold a board to account in a courtroom rather than a boardroom — begin after that. Wanderers have survived worse tables than this one; the file on the desk is new.
Confirmed vs. disputed
Confirmed (by the club): The summons was received and requires the executive to appear on 7 October; it was filed by Davies Nsama and the Community Pressure Group; it has been sent to Mopani's legal department; the club will comply.
Disputed or untested: The plaintiffs' membership status, which the club denies; the merits of their case, not yet heard; any effect on the executive's tenure, which the summons does not determine.
Sources: Lusaka Times, "Muf Wanderers exco dragged to court" (3 Oct 2026); Mufulira Wanderers board statement (3 Oct 2026); Lusaka Times weekend scorecard (5 Oct 2026).
Back to the front page